Add reviewers to Bitbucket/Bitbucket Server and Gitlab/Gitlab Self-managed pull requests

Comments: 12

• 09 Sep, '21
  flex67

  Will this be fixed ? It's really annoying having to open bitbucket to complete the pull request.

• 19 Nov, '21
  Julia

  This feature would be very useful for GitLab as well!

• 15 Dec, '21
  Rob

  it is still broken, the hole ui for creating a pull request for bitbucket server, is still unusable.
  support asked me to use version 7 if i need this feature.😒

• 16 Mar, '22
  Robert Síbek

  This should be included as default. While the VScode has this option, I'd expect the same for a premium subscription. Please guys, add this feature. Thanks.

• 02 Jun, '22
  Robrecht

  +1 for reviewers field in GitLab

• 06 Jul, '22
  Homero

  +1 for adding default reviewers and elements from bitbucket server integration

• 15 Jul, '22
  Philipp

  Adding reviewers via the UI is a feature - I'm fine with that.
  
  But the fact that the default reviewers are not added to PRs is a bug in my opinion. This URL https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/bitbucket/rest/api-group-pullrequests/ states clearly, that default reviewers are automatically added, when no reviewers are defined when creating the PR.
  
  I guess, that GitKraken just sets a empty list of reviewers right now which leads to the default reviewers not beeing configured automatically.

• 02 Feb
  Mattia

  Wonder why this feature is not available for Bitbucket.

• 19 Apr
  Adamo

  Needed for self-managed GitLab, please. Crazy that you can set Assignee but no Reviewer.

• 26 Apr
  ch.o

  I hope this will be implemented soon. It would be a lot more convenient for many to create PR, without needing to go for the extra step to add reviewer on the GitLab side.

• 06 May
  Patrick M

  This would be great for GitLab self-managed as well!

• 15 May
  Thomas

  +1 to BitBucket reviewers