Ideas for GitKraken as submitted to our Feature Upvote board. Ideas are ordered by 'new' and the 50 top matches are included. pr_fmebawdb60uvqek 2026-02-09T14:10:22Z sug_slevmyvbmjjwyfb 2021-06-02T19:08:49Z 2025-05-30T17:40:52Z Welcome to GitKraken Feature Upvote 👋 Got an idea to improve GitKraken Desktop? You’re in the right place. Our product team checks this board regularly when planning new features. Before submitting, search to see if your idea already exists — and give it an upvote if it does. 📝 How to write a helpful suggestion Be specific and tell us how your idea would help. You can use this format: “As a [type of user], I want [feature] so that I can [benefit].” We read every suggestion. Please follow our Code of Conduct: https://www.gitkraken.com/slack-code-of-conduct. 🗳 Where’s my post? All submissions are moderated before appearing on the board. We aim to review weekly and may merge or split requests. 🐞 Found a bug? This board is for features only. For bugs, contact support: https://help.gitkraken.com/gitkraken-desktop/contact-support/?product_s_=GitKraken%20Desktop sug_roxxay1gacdbj2q 2026-04-21T17:48:21Z 2026-05-14T13:57:23Z Click on a modified file in the change list to show the diff view. Scroll down. Edit the file in the background. GitKraken refreshes and scrolls to top in the diff view. sug_n4h52g7tz3ixvdw 2026-05-07T20:21:27Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z Before Version 12.1.0 I was able to see a whole diff by file of a pull request right in gitkraken desktop, now that button was replaced for the web integration, it seems it is still possible to get the diff by right clicking the PR and click "Review code and suggest changes" sug_wintnhfoogxwmvf 2026-05-08T05:13:22Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z First off, GitKraken is genuinely my favorite Git client — the UX is fantastic and I use it daily across many projects. There's one workflow gap I keep hitting, though, and I'd love to see it addressed. **The pain** I work on multiple unrelated projects throughout the day. Each project usually involves 2-4 repos (frontend, backend, shared libs, infra). When I'm in Project A and need to jump to Project B, my tab bar becomes an unsorted mix of 6-8 tabs and I lose track of which belongs where. Closing and reopening repos every context switch is friction-heavy. **What I've already tried** I know Repository Management has folders, and I use Workspaces — but neither solves this. Repo Management is about cataloging *all* my repos. Workspaces lets me open a set together, but after that the tabs are flat in the bar. I want **visual grouping of currently open tabs**, not project-as-config. **The ask** Chrome-style tab groups in the repo tab bar: - Right-click → add to group (named, colored) - Collapse / expand groups - Drag tabs between groups This is a small UX addition but would massively improve daily workflow for anyone juggling multiple projects. It complements Workspaces rather than duplicating it. Thanks for building such a great tool — would love to see this land! sug_6neb3tgkzteijbj 2026-05-08T11:32:01Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z When the app asks a question, appearing at the top like "are you sure blahblah?", make it respond to the Enter and Esc keys. In some cases at least Esc already works. Keep that. sug_zgvglqdz6j5xxbz 2026-05-09T13:35:31Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z I only have 1 or 2 real active Claude sessions, yet the GitKraken UI shows 14 and counting. It doesn't re-sync on startup, so re-starting doesn't fix this. I can't R+Click to dismiss or inspect where these phantom sessions live. I literally just re-started my computer and it still thinks there's 14 sessions waiting for input. This technically doesn't hurt anything, but it is visual noise and causes the Worktree view to take up an absurd amount of vertical space. sug_rbnjfusjfi2hmhv 2026-05-12T09:06:53Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z When I use "pin to left" on our main branch, the graph uses increasingly more horizontal space the further down the history I go. Visually, the use of space seems unnecessary. I would like it to use less or even minimal horizontal space. See the attached example, where I needed a 4K widescreen to see the graph from even a few weeks back. sug_eqzegbngh6exa2b 2026-05-12T19:32:16Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z Please can you make the delete branch button red so it is easier to find on the huge menu Adding icons will also help find items quicker. I am using GitKraken for 4 years and still struggle to find the item I need 😅 sug_jrvv8zce2libaqo 2026-05-14T01:54:29Z 2026-05-14T13:57:06Z The new agent/worktrees setup is fantastic and I can't wait to see what you guys do with it next. I think a great next step would be to allow opening multiple terminal tabs within a worktree. I frequently run multiple terminal windows in the same worktree directory (one for codex, one for claude, one for local server, etc). The ability to have these grouped to a specific worktree and labeled would save me the trouble of having to hop between terminal windows and figure out which worktree they belong to. sug_ungawpuchxokxis 2026-03-30T18:56:54Z 2026-05-07T18:11:30Z Hi, Today, I "found out" that I have a lot of things stashed, so wanted to cleanup, selected 5 stashes (in the stashes view) right click then "delete stash" although it supports selection doesn't delete them all. So i started deleting them one by one, but delete stash was on the left and the "are you sure" was on the top, so had to glide back and forth for each stash to delete. I wouldn't mind going back and forth for each N selection once, but this way is just painful. Also if I could just press enter to acknowledge delete or use left-right keys to select between "delete", "cancel" that would also improve the experience. Thanks. sug_hgy4wycq373eigv 2026-04-03T15:37:54Z 2026-05-07T18:11:30Z It's annoying sug_x3dnrl0fpequddr 2026-04-30T07:35:29Z 2026-05-07T18:11:30Z I understand that GitKraken has grown beyond being only a Git GUI, and that features like AI, workspaces, teams, etc are valuable for many users and for the product’s direction. That said, I’d really appreciate an option for a more lightweight version focused on the original workflow: managing local repositories and interacting with the remotes. sug_fbri6pioln6mizu 2026-05-07T03:18:27Z 2026-05-07T18:11:30Z I have 2 profiles and I would like to work on 2 profiles simultaneously, but right now I can only active 1 profile at a time. I would be greate if I can have 2 profiles active in 2 different GitKraken window, so that I can fast navigate between 2 profiles instead of keep switching profile. sug_onnkwfpyp0dpigd 2026-04-22T14:19:08Z 2026-04-24T16:53:48Z Right now I have to browse to the executable for my VSCodium installation. From the "External editor" dropdown, I can only select Cursor (presumably listed because I've got it installed). Can you please add "support" for a bunch more external editors? For me it'd be VSCodium, but I've also got Notepad++ which isn't listed at all (not that any sane person would use it, but it should be there for completeness sake). sug_thfs1atybmloxq0 2026-04-22T14:31:02Z 2026-04-24T16:53:47Z When I want to squish commit A into commit B in the interactive rebase tool, I do not want the commit message A, to be added as an extra line in commit message B. I always have to go and reword that commit, and remove the line added from commit A. Usually what I do, is I add commits "temporarily" as I remember I had to add something to a commit that is already behind another one. So the commit message will be something basic, just for me to remember what to squish it with. So it's annoying that GK adds that to the target commit message. So please add an option to also squish commit *messages* during interactive rebase (which is fine to be turned on by default), so that I can turn that off. Then I won't have to reword the target commit every time again. sug_bbdg2ct6mhusg06 2026-04-23T16:12:29Z 2026-04-24T16:53:47Z When trying to figure what has changed in pascal files the embedded diff viewer is useless. Thankfully we have access to an external diff viewer. I use Beyond Compare and it does a much better job at it. Can you look into: a - make it easier to run Beyond Compare on a file - the current workflow makes me right-click and then select Beyond Compare. Given the amount of time I use a diff viewer, I would like to be able to use a single click invocation. b - Improve the embedded diff viewer so it is not such a disaster. Thanks, Alan sug_b70mtfzut9jskpn 2026-04-24T09:15:47Z 2026-04-24T16:53:47Z Add possibility to select files in tab "UnStage files" with such hotkeys like: "SHIFT + Arrows" and "Ctrl + A" sug_yawzpwgly4gzm0t 2026-04-20T14:04:30Z 2026-04-21T15:04:52Z Agent Sessions View is great and really helpful when running multiple agents in the same repository. However, if I'm running agents in multiple repositories I've noticed that I have to keep switching tabs to watch for authorization prompts. I haven't noticed any way to stay informed without constantly switching. Apologies if there's something I missed. Would it be possible to get a little icon on a tab when such a prompt appears? I've noticed claude code updates the tab title in windows terminal so I hope it's possible. sug_nzsvsgxlbq1ybvm 2026-04-17T08:22:00Z 2026-04-17T19:28:26Z As of 12.0.0, it seems that we can no longer select then copy arbitrary text in the diff view. When attempting to highlight text in order to copy it, a pop-up instantly appears with the option to either select the entire line or the entire diff. I don't want to do either of those two things, and the pop-up appearing prevent me doing the thing I wanted to do. Why is this useful? Well, I wanted to select and copy the name of a key item in my code, so I could paste it into the commit message. sug_jj5vxyoijxnkgw0 2026-04-17T11:02:02Z 2026-04-17T19:28:26Z As an enterprise user configuring GitKraken AI with a custom OpenAI‑compatible provider, I want to be able to map or override the model identifiers GitKraken sends (e.g. gpt-4.1) to provider‑specific identifiers (e.g. Azure deployment names), so that GitKraken AI can work reliably with Azure OpenAI environments accessed through internal gateways or API Management layers. Context In enterprise setups where Azure OpenAI is exposed behind an internal gateway (for example via API Management), executable model identifiers are deployment names (e.g. dep-gpt-4o), not catalog model names like gpt-4.1. When GitKraken AI is configured with a custom OpenAI‑compatible endpoint: - GitKraken displays and sends fixed internal model IDs (e.g. gpt-4.1, gpt-4o) - These identifiers are sent verbatim in /chat/completions - The provider correctly rejects the request because no such deployment exists The connection test succeeds, but actual AI actions fail at runtime. How this feature would help Allowing one of the following would resolve this cleanly: - A way for custom providers to define model aliases or mappings (e.g. gpt-4.1 → dep-gpt-4o) - Or the ability for users to manually specify or pin a model identifier for custom providers - Or honoring /v1/models dynamically for execution when a custom provider is configured This would make GitKraken AI compatible with enterprise Azure OpenAI deployments, without requiring proxy‑side workarounds. Why this matters - Azure OpenAI deployments behind gateways are common in large organizations - API Management layers are standard for security and compliance - GitKraken AI otherwise works very well in these environments - Supporting model identifier mapping would significantly improve enterprise compatibility Thanks for considering this enhancement, and for all the work on GitKraken AI! sug_onvko5itn28bjar 2026-04-17T14:54:41Z 2026-04-17T19:28:26Z I work in 4k at work. The GUI is fine. At home, I work in 1080p on my laptop screen. It is CRAMPED, so I zoom out to 80%. It works fine...UNTIL I OPEN THE TERMINAL! I tried a magnifying glass, but the pixels are too big. I tried ctrl+scroll but the terminal ignored me and pretended it didn't know who I was. Total burn. Now that we are intended to run AI in that little rectangle it seems important to be able to zoom in and out at will without resizing the entire GUI. sug_xejdnawkmhglgae 2026-03-31T01:28:38Z 2026-04-16T15:09:26Z When too many tags exist in different folder, it takes time to scroll and locate it. Though clicking a folder is able to collapse that folder, there is no easy to collapse all. Cmd+click , like other apps, does not work. Request: quick way to collapse/expand all the folders in tags section. thanks! sug_tnlr43eyxocoxqn 2026-04-02T09:46:59Z 2026-04-16T15:09:26Z The GitKraken UI is visually appealing, but it is not always convenient when an action is in progress (such as pull, branch checkout, or discarding changes, and many others). In some cases, the UI does not clearly indicate that an action is currently being processed. When feedback is provided, it is inconsistent: for example, a pull operation only greys out the pull button with a small animated icon, while a branch checkout displays a loading animation in the left panel. In most situations, the user simply wants to wait for the current action to complete before performing another one. For this reason, it would be more user-friendly to display a consistent, blocking modal or loading animation for all long-running actions, rather than relying on multiple, scattered indicators. Additionally, some UI interactions remain available while a long action is running (such as during a pull). These actions are sometimes ignored without any feedback, which can be confusing and uncomfortable for the user. A blocking UI would also help prevent this issue by clearly communicating that GitKraken is busy. sug_jbrfiqdvjhjrdr0 2026-04-08T19:28:49Z 2026-04-16T15:09:26Z When you have no files selected in the Unstaged Files list, the trashcan icon discards all changes. When you have one file selected, the trashcan icon discards all changes. When you have two files selected, it discards changes to those two files. This implementation feels inconsistent. I expect the trashcan to discard changes made to my selected files, if any are selected. Otherwise, discard all changes. The current implementation only discards changes for selected files if two or more files are selected. Otherwise, if one or fewer files are selected, it discards all changes. sug_i7tehjtlgz6jyi3 2026-04-16T06:26:23Z 2026-04-16T15:09:26Z Rebase / Cancel buttons are hidden when rebasing branches with many commits (see screenshot) Workaround is to use "cmd -" shortcut to zoom out so that the buttons can fit in the window. Otherwise there's no way to proceed with the rebase. sug_svthjfp4cq6am1o 2026-04-07T16:34:49Z 2026-04-08T18:14:34Z These options only serve to create accidental errors or mishaps. When working with staged/unstaged items the only possible things that you should be able to do are stage/unstage, this a GIT client not an IDE. sug_06uejlj7yrf6noq 2026-04-08T10:08:08Z 2026-04-08T18:14:34Z I’d like GitKraken to support a local-only way to ignore or hide files without adding them to the repository’s .gitignore. Sometimes I need files to exist inside the project folder, but they are in a limbo state. I may want to commit them later, but for now I want to keep them local and stop them cluttering the unstaged changes list. A good example is something like an agents.md file that may or may not end up belonging in the repo, but which I still need locally. Another is when I want to make local changes to existing test files without having those changes constantly showing up in GitKraken while I experiment. What I would like to see is a per-user, local-only hide or ignore state inside GitKraken. The file should stay in the project folder, not appear in the unstaged list, not modify the shared .gitignore, and be easy to un-ignore later so it can be committed normally. This looks like it is partially covered by the existing request for .git/info/exclude support, because that only helps with untracked files. It does not cover tracked files with local modifications that I want to temporarily hide from the unstaged view. sug_qqwe2ijwxp7uj4w 2026-04-08T18:10:17Z 2026-04-08T18:14:34Z Many operations in Gitkraken are able to be easily cancelled by hitting the Escape key on the keyboard. Operations that support the escape key include: - "Create branch" dialog/textfield - The "Create Worktree" panel - The confirmation banner that appears when you attempt to do many operations, like cherry-pick (e.g. "Do you want to immediately commit the cherry picked changes?"), Drop Commit, Revert Commit, etc. It's very convenient! But, inconveniently, many similar-looking operations do NOT support the escape key. Operations that do not support the escape key include: - "Cancel reword" (when editing a commit message in the Commit Details Panel) - Interactive rebase - Rename branch - etc ...even though many of these things use the same UI patterns. This creates unnecessary UX friction, and reveals that there's opportunity to make things more "DRY" under the hood. Please consider addressing this. Thanks so much! sug_axeoqtfghxvkgth 2026-03-24T13:40:00Z 2026-03-30T13:47:05Z GK defaults to `<repository foldername>.worktrees/<worktree folder>` There is no way to change this default that I can find. For example, if your repo is in `c:\repos\foo` then GK puts your worktree in `c:\repos\foot.worktrees\<wt folder>`. I want to put my worktrees in `c:\repos\foo\.worktrees\<wt folder>` If you try to use the folder selector, GK will throw a validation error if you create the WT Folder, but the folder dialog won't let you select a non-existent folder. You also cannot edit the folder path manually b/c the text field is read-only. sug_e5cvdulf2zxn86r 2026-03-26T10:14:56Z 2026-03-30T13:46:38Z Currently we can only change encoding setting per repository. I would be very great to set it for Gitkraken globally, especially "Guess encoding" (with mixed encoding within projects). sug_xtbokd9qv1jvntg 2026-03-10T21:55:20Z 2026-03-30T13:46:08Z if i want to do the following: see all commit history for a specific file 1. i must first "find" the file in order to right-click to select "file history", e.g., find a commit containing this file 2. using "search" on commits only searches on the commit text, not on files committed. so, using search on a file-name doesn't work why isn't this something that's easy and straightforward to do? in that, having the thought "what's the commit history for this file?" is, for me anyway, a question i'm often asking myself. not having access to the output of the command "git log -p -- filename", through the gui, is an odd lacking, don't you think? can the gui be enhanced such that the question "what's the commit history for a given file?" could be made easy to answer using the gui directly, instead of having to resort to git cli commands? thanks for your consideration sug_44awbgdl3incgji 2026-03-20T17:07:00Z 2026-03-25T16:10:01Z Gitkraken has great worktree support, which is excellent when working with parallel AI agents. But the UX for managing work trees could benefit from some refinements. Here are some additions that would significantly improve the worktree user experience for my use cases: - In the Left Panel the context menu that appears when right-clicking on a worktree ("worktree actions") only allow you to Open, Remove, or Lock the worktree - It would be great if this menu had a "Copy worktree path" option, and/or a "Show in Finder" option - In the commit timeline, when right clicking on commit that is checked-out by a worktree, the only corktree-specific operation available is "Create worktree from..." —which is always shown for any and all commits regardless of context. - Instead, I would love to see some worktree operations in here; at the very least, a "delete worktree" option sug_oi4pknexgwipabu 2026-03-19T18:53:29Z 2026-03-20T13:56:20Z Currently, the only options for commit signing in GitKracken are OPENPGP and SSH. I need to use x509 and smimesign.exe. When I configure these setting through 'git config --global', GitKracken does not sign commits even when the Git Executable is set to the locally installed git (not bundled). Im not sure why that is as the application should only be using git.exe to execute all git tasks (when set). Last, my local gitconfig works in SourceTree. sug_drwqrsq6f1aksa8 2026-01-29T13:56:38Z 2026-03-18T18:52:33Z TL;DR Add the ability to search commits by file name Currently, to find the history of a file, users must manually browse through commits or use the command line with git log path/to/file, which is not very user-friendly. Having a dedicated search functionality that allows users to input a file name and retrieve all relevant commits would greatly enhance the usability of GitKraken. This feature would streamline the process of tracking changes to specific files, especially for those who may not be as comfortable using the command line. sug_b5fsqmqtua9rfie 2026-03-17T18:45:16Z 2026-03-18T18:52:33Z Please add a small search that goes through unstaged and staged file names and if possible the changed data itself. Then filters those files. I can't count how much I needed this small feature and I'm sure you guys can code it with your feet at this point. sug_hsu93be6ahxndlx 2026-03-04T21:29:29Z 2026-03-16T20:44:31Z I often use Gitkraken on a small laptop for field work. Its screen is 1920x1080 but the Gitkraken UI is only just useable on it. My main problem is that the stacked panels on the right, with the unstaged, staged files and commit box take up so much space that its hard to read their content (see attached screenshot). If the panels could be layed out horizontally instead of vertically that would really help. sug_wolcm1oscmweaph 2026-03-04T08:59:21Z 2026-03-16T20:43:00Z In repositories with a high volume of branches, navigating to frequently used branches is difficult. While the search functionality is helpful, it still requires manual input every time. Proposed Solution: Introduce a "Star" or "Favorite" functionality for branches. Users should be able to pin their most-used branches to the top of the branch selector for quicker access and improved workflow efficiency. Attached you can see awful design from nano banana sug_9rxfhumcygebtno 2026-03-10T18:36:27Z 2026-03-16T20:43:00Z Hi there! Despite it is not too good to add DLLs in GIT repository, GitKraken and probably native GIT itself are not verbose at all at differences in binary changes. Currently in GitKraken DLL in changes, I just see "Binary File", while there are many useful information and metadata that can help us identify the changes. It can start by showing the size in bytes, MD5 of the files too. Also, in DLL and EXE files, it can maybe show Creating Date, File and Product Version, if it is Code Signed or not, the date of signature, Etc. See Attachment. sug_4yq1zpv3vlvfrft 2026-03-11T06:23:19Z 2026-03-16T20:43:00Z Feature Request: Filter staged files by extension It would be great if GitKraken allowed filtering staged files by file extension (e.g., .js, .ts, .json). This would help quickly find specific file types in large commits. sug_vkxzoa6xtl7syc7 2026-03-12T03:58:25Z 2026-03-16T20:43:00Z The recent repo list appears to show all repos regardless of the profile - this list should be profile specific to prevent opening and working on a project while in the wrong profile. sug_vpgbatyrvg3wyvk 2026-03-12T10:33:39Z 2026-03-16T20:43:00Z As a new user when using creating pull request it is not always obvious why [Create Pull Request] button is disable sug_hkrvafnfaky7f5u 2026-03-12T17:19:08Z 2026-03-16T20:43:00Z GitKraken allows you to see either the tree/commits (by clicking > on the left) or you pick a file in the commit then get to see the diff for that file (but at that point the tree/commit view becomes covered) . If the UI allowed you to see the tree/commit/file diff in separate windows all at the same time it makes it much much easier to compare and find changes on multiple branches. You have full view of the domain. I used to use SmartGit which has that feature, I suggest you buy a copy and have a play with it to see how easier navigation is on your competitors products. What I am asking here is just a toggle option to change the view layout to be able to see all the tree/commit/file diff views at the same time, even if they (e.g. the diff view) is smaller. sug_fqisoruyn8sxtmw 2026-03-03T12:22:58Z 2026-03-10T16:27:39Z There aren't many OS issue tracking options available, and we use a self-hosted Forgejo git server. This also features issue tracking. Although we successfully use Forgejo to manage our git repositories, we cannot use the issue tracker. Please add ability to connect to this to gitkraken to improve prodctivity (especially with AI tools). sug_pqfmmct7idzbqqj 2026-03-04T20:47:29Z 2026-03-10T16:27:39Z I occasionally run across a case where I just need `master` to look like another branch, 100%. I need some merge operation that results in `master` looking like, for example, `develop`. This would normally be a `git merge -s theirs` command, which doesn't exist. But doing this is pretty easy with a few commands in a certain order. It would be nice if there were a way to do this quickly in GitKraken. git merge -s theirs # or whatever branch you want this to end up in git checkout develop git pull git checkout master git pull git merge --no-commit -s ours develop git rm -rf . # make sure you are at the top level! git checkout develop -- . git commit --no-edit git branch CB/master-like-develop git push --set-upstream origin CB/master-like-develop git checkout master git reset --hard origin/master sug_u9ddmslrfqpkghj 2026-03-09T07:50:55Z 2026-03-10T16:27:39Z I have 2 browsers, one for my Azure/professional logins and one for all my private work, which is the default browser. I need to do the Azure DevOps OAuth on the non default browser, but the 'Connect to Azure DevOps' button can only open in my default browser, which is very frustrating. Copying the URL does not work, as it will then give an error when I signed in on the second browser. Having a way to copy the URL or select the browser to use would be great sug_nfzbarsejkey9sw 2026-03-10T10:38:17Z 2026-03-10T16:27:39Z Hi GitKraken team, I’d like to submit a feature request regarding merge request support directly inside GitKraken. In my daily workflow, I often interact with Git repositories using only a personal access token. Because of that, it would be extremely useful to have a built-in interface in GitKraken to view and interact with merge requests directly through the same token-based access. The goal would be to keep the workflow centralized inside GitKraken without needing to constantly switch to the web interface. Useful capabilities could include: - listing merge requests for the repository - viewing merge request details - checking status, reviewers, comments, and pipeline results - adding comments or reviewing directly from GitKraken - approving or merging when permissions allow it This would significantly improve the developer experience for users who primarily work with token-based Git access. Thank you for considering this feature. sug_cny5w2ikkp0kyu1 2026-03-02T14:42:53Z 2026-03-02T20:04:09Z I really don't know exactly how, I get it's a challenge in terms of UI/UX,, but would be nice to have a way select commits to merge on AI commit composer. sug_qg5j8hrwvtqc9uj 2026-02-20T11:12:02Z 2026-02-25T19:24:11Z The integration from GitKraken to Google works, but GitKraken appears to have a fixed list of outdated models that can't be run anymore. It should obtain a list of current models available to run and present those in the UI. sug_zr7uuia8flhbg1i 2026-02-21T15:06:34Z 2026-02-25T19:24:11Z Summary: Currently, when viewing changes in files tracked by Git LFS, GitKraken only displays the diff of the pointer metadata (version, SHA-256, and size). For developers working with large assets or binary files, this makes it impossible to review actual content changes within the client. Requested Feature: Please implement a way to preview the actual content diff for LFS files. For images, show a visual comparison (like the "Swipe" or "Onion Skin" mode found in other clients). For text-based LFS files, allow rendering the actual file content diff. Why it matters: Users currently have to switch to external tools (like UGit or TortoiseGit) just to verify if an LFS asset was updated correctly. As a Pro user, I expect a seamless experience for large-asset management without leaving GitKraken. sug_py5gd76ptblcmju 2026-02-21T15:09:18Z 2026-02-25T19:24:11Z Summary: The "Compose Commit with AI" feature is a game-changer for workflow organization. However, the current process requires a manual "Push" action after the AI finishes creating the commits. Requested Feature: Add a checkbox or a dedicated "Create & Push Commits" button within the AI Composition window. Why it matters: For developers who maintain multiple repositories and aim for maximum efficiency, this would save several clicks per task. It streamlines the entire "Code -> AI Organize -> Sync" pipeline, making the AI integration feel much more native and "one-stop."